
Centre for The Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE) has warned against reversing the reforms at this stage, insisting such action would be damaging to the nation’s economy.
The Centre, in a statement signed by its Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Muda Yusuf, however called on the federal government to translate macro-economic gains, so far recorded, into higher productivity, more jobs and improved living standards, since businesses and the purchasing power of the average Nigerian still remain under pressure.
It noted that while the government had, through its various reforms, laid important foundations for investment and growth, it however stated that such macro-economic gains should be seen as a means, and not an end itself.
The Centre argued that the results the federal government intends to achieve with the reforms, remains incomplete, since those reforms were yet to translate into lower poverty and ameliorate the pains of Nigerians.
“Purchasing power remains under pressure, while businesses continue to contend with high energy, financing, logistics and regulatory costs,” the Centre stated.
It therefore called for the next phase of reform that would focus more strongly on productivity, competitiveness and household welfare.
CPPE added that while the reforms had significantly expanded the fiscal space of state governments through higher statutory allocations and, in many cases, stronger internally generated revenues, it however believed this should translate to the sub-nationals playing a much larger development role.
The Centre therefore urged citizens to begin to demand measurable outcomes in roads, healthcare, public transportation, education, agricultural infrastructure, security, power and enterprise support, from their respective state governments.
It added that higher revenues must produce a visible development and welfare dividend, rather than being used to simply finance higher recurrent expenditure and prestige projects.
Speaking on reversal of the policy, the Centre argued: “It would undermine investor confidence, weaken fiscal stability, destabilise the foreign-exchange market and reintroduce distortions that the reforms were designed to correct.
“Such a reversal could trigger significant economic dislocations and erode the gains already achieved. The reform trajectory should therefore be sustained, while implementation is continuously refined in response to emerging realities.”




Comments